Loading resource…

Hospital General San Juan del Río Querétaro, Mexico
Intravenous fluids have traditionally been a routine treatment for critically ill patients; however, recent evidence suggests that aggressive fluid therapy may lead to adverse outcomes such as pulmonary edema and organ failure. The document reviews the pathophysiological implications of fluid administration and presents a narrative review of current guidelines and studies regarding fluid management in critical care settings. It aims to provide insights into when less fluid may be more beneficial for patient outcomes.
Sign in to open
Answers use this document only.
Your first question is free.
Resources from the same specialty and type. Curated links will replace these when added.
Documents that extend or complement this resource.

VENOUS DOPPLER TO ASSESS CONGESTION: A COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW OF CURRENT EVIDENCE AND NOMENCLATURE
Same clinical topic · Intensive Care

HOW TO IMPROVE THE EFFICIENCY AND THE SAFETY OF REAL - TIME ULTRASOUND - GUIDED CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETERIZATION IN 2023: A NARRATIVE REVIEW
Same clinical topic · Intensive Care

UPDATE ON SEPSIS TREATMENT
Same clinical topic · Intensive Care

WHAT'S NEW IN INTENSIVE CARE
Same clinical topic · Intensive Care

CURRENT PRACTICE AND EVOLVING CONCEPTS IN SEPTIC SHOCK RESUSCITATION
Same clinical topic · Intensive Care

ANTIBIOTICS MUST BE PART OF END-OF-LIFE DECISIONS: A NECESSARY EVIL?
Same clinical topic · Intensive Care

Unnecessary fluid therapy in patients with shock Five classic fluid
Same clinical topic · Intensive Care

ABC of Intensive Care
Same clinical topic · Intensive Care

Traumatic Brain Injury
Same resource type · Neurology